What happened to Jan Hendrik Schon?

What happened to Jan Hendrik Schon?

Schön’s co-authors were exonerated, but he was released from his job at Bell Labs. So, where is Jan Hendrik Schön today? At last report, he is working for an air conditioning company in Germany. He has been barred from working as a scientist.

What was so important about Hendrik Schön’s research?

They found that whole data sets had been reused in a number of different experiments. They also found that some of his graphs, which purportedly had been plotted from experimental data, had instead been produced using mathematical functions. The report found that all of the misdeeds had been performed by Schön alone.

What did Jan Hendrik Schon do?

Formerly a rising star in the field of nanotechnology, Schön was renowned for creating field-effect transistors, the backbone of modern electronics, out of tiny molecules. His work won him numerous awards from magazines and scientific organizations, and colleagues were beginning to tip him for a Nobel Prize.

What are the known frauds in science?

There are many types of science fraud, from minor manipulation of results or incorrect causal connections to full-blown fabrication of results and plagiarism of the work of others. There have been cases of researchers stealing the work of their students to obtain all of the credit and kudos.

How can research misconduct be prevented?

The best way to prevent research misconduct is to become aware of best practices in the Responsible Conduct of Research. Consultation with senior research colleagues, as well as School and campus leaders, are invaluable resources. In addition, there is a variety of training and educational materials available online.

What is the difference between fabrication and falsification?

Fabrication is “making up data or results.” Falsification is “manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record.”

How can we prevent falsification in research?

1. Be a stickler for accuracy. Develop and maintain guidelines and high standards for accuracy in the facts you report.
2. Take responsibility for every fact.
3. Stick to the facts.
4. Be aware of the legal risks.

What is the reasons for committing research misconduct?

A range of possible reasons were posited: (1) career and funding pressures, (2) institutional failures of oversight, (3) commercial conflicts of interest, (4) inadequate training, (5) erosion of standards of mentoring, and (6) part of a larger pattern of social deviance.

What is the principle of falsification?

The Falsification Principle, proposed by Karl Popper, is a way of demarcating science from non-science. It suggests that for a theory to be considered scientific it must be able to be tested and conceivably proven false. For example, the hypothesis that “all swans are white,” can be falsified by observing a black swan.

Which is an example of falsification in research?

Examples of falsification include: Presenting false transcripts or references in application for a program. Submitting work which is not your own or was written by someone else. Lying about a personal issue or illness in order to extend a deadline.