What is the SPIKES model of breaking bad news?

What is the SPIKES model of breaking bad news?

What is the SPIKES model of breaking bad news?

The SPIKES protocol for breaking bad news has four objectives: Gathering information from the patient • Transmitting the medical information • Providing support to the patient • Eliciting patient’s collaboration in developing a strategy or treatment for the future.

What is the SPIKES method?

The SPIKES protocol is a method used in clinical medicine to break bad news to patients and families. As receiving bad news can cause distress and anxiety, clinicians need to deliver the news carefully.

How do I deliver bad news Spike?

When delivering bad news, provide a setting that assures privacy, limits interruptions, and involves family, if the patient desires. When delivering bad news, use nontechnical words and avoid medical jargon. Provide empathy; avoid being blunt and allow time for patients to express emotions.

How do you give someone bad news professionally?

Be Genuine. When the time comes to deliver the message, try to be authentic and compassionate, and treat the other person with respect and dignity. Don’t try to “sugarcoat” the truth; it’s best to be forthright and honest about what’s happened, and about what you’re going to do to make it right.

How do doctors break bad news to a patient?

Be frank but compassionate; avoid euphemisms and medical jargon. Allow for silence and tears; proceed at the patient’s pace. Have the patient describe his or her understanding of the news; repeat this information at subsequent visits. Allow time to answer questions; write things down and provide written information.

How do you say bad news in a positive way?

How To Deliver Bad News in a Positive Way

  1. Acknowledge the Facts.
  2. Stop Sugarcoating the Unknown and Unknowable.
  3. Focus on Options for the Future.
  4. Structure the Message Appropriately.

Is no news good news from doctor?

No news isn’t necessarily good news for patients waiting for the results of medical tests. The first study of its kind finds doctors failed to inform patients of abnormal cancer screenings and other test results 1 out of 14 times.